Posts

Showing posts from March, 2018

CO/5012/2017: An application to renew was made some time ago

Permission for Judicial Review in CO/5012/2017 was refused by Phillip Mott QC in January. See CO/5012/2017: Phillip Mott QC refuses permission for Judicial Review for a link to the decision of Phillip Mott QC. An application was made some weeks ago to renew. This means that in due course that CO/5012/2017 will be considered at an oral hearing. There is significant overlap between the substance of CO/5012/2017 and the so-called Article 50 Challenge by Liz Webster (CO/5929/2017) regarding which an application was made to renew in the last 48 hours. It would make a great deal of sense if both Claims for Judicial Review were considered at the same oral hearing.

CO/5929/2017: Liz Webster seeks to renew her application for permission for Judicial Review

I am informed that Liz Webster has made an application to renew her application for permission for Judicial Review following Mr. Justice Supperstone's decision on 28th February to refuse permission for Judicial Review on consideration of Ms. Webster's written submission(s). The effect of Ms. Webster's application for renewal is that an oral hearing will be held in open Court in due course. A copy of Mr. Justice Supperstone's decision of 28th February is available via this link: CO/5929/2017: Mr. Justice Supperstone refuses permission for Judicial Review in the Article 50 Challenge

CO/5929/2017: Mr. Justice Supperstone refuses permission for Judicial Review in the Article 50 Challenge

Readers interested in the outcome (so far) of the Article 50 Challenge can find Mr. Justice Supperstone's decision of 28th February 2018 in which he refused permission for Judicial Review here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=16YOVDk_NMt2IgbnRX80oeovdNV5cOQ9J The relevant file begins with 20180228.